nau logo
Ecological Restoration
Institute
Ponderosa Pine forest with lupine
  • Home
  • Ecological Research
    • Arizona
      • Apache-Sitgreaves
      • Camp Navajo Restoration
      • Campus Restoration Demo
      • Cave Creek Sonoran Desert
      • Centennial Forest
      • Grand Canyon Monitoring
      • Grand Canyon Fire Ecology
      • Grand Canyon Restoration
      • Gus Pearson Restoration
      • Historical Permanent Plot Data
      • Mount Trumbull
      • Pinyon-Juniper Wildfires
      • Rodeo-Chediski
      • San Francisco Peaks
      • Sunset Crater Beardtongue
      • Tusayan Pinyon-Juniper
      • Flagstaff Urban Wildland
      • Mt. Trumbull JFSP
    • Colorado
      • San Juan National Forest
    • New Mexico
      • Historical Permanent Plot Data
    • Northern Mexico
      • Overview
      • Field Sites
      • Researchers
      • Links
      • Progress
      • Contact Information
    • Southwest Fire Initiative
      • SW Fire Initiative Papers
  • Social Science Research
    • Collaboration Lessons
    • Fire Management Synthesis
    • Multiparty Monitoring Methods
    • Public Perceptions Synthesis
    • Community Needs
    • White Mountains Landscape
  • Restoration Resources
    • Ecological Restoration
      • What is ER?
      • Restoration Approaches
      • Principles of ER
    • The ER Process
      • One Size Does Not Fit All
      • Est Reference Conditions
      • Using Reference Conditions
      • Adaptive Management
      • Landscape-level Planning
    • Restoration Treatments
      • Presettlement Model
      • STIFH Model
      • Landscape-level Treatments
      • ER vs. Thinning
    • Information for Policymakers
      • Effects of Thinning on Fire
      • Costs vs. Benefits
      • ER vs. Thinning
    • Information for Practitioners
      • Information for Practitioners
      • Forest Policy and Planning
      • Collaborative Forest Mgmt
      • Ask the Experts
      • Short Guide for CFRP
      • Restoring Forest Roads
      • Seeding
      • Treating Slash
      • Monitoring
      • Protecting Old Growth
      • Preventing Soil Compaction
      • Costs vs. Benefits
      • Controlling Invasive Species
    • Agency Outreach Team
      • Agency Outreach Team
  • Education
    • Undergraduate
      • What Students Do
      • Student Jobs
      • Required Courses
      • Senior Projects
      • Professional Development
      • Student Meetings
      • Job Resources
      • Alumni
      • Student Services Team
      • Scholarships
      • Graduate School
    • Graduate
      • Alumni
      • Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Assistantships
ERI
  • About ERI
  • Directory
  • ERI FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • Calendar
  • Login
  • Spotlight
Resources
  • News
  • Publications
  • Library
  • Events and Gallery
  • Restoration Links
  • Other Links

PostHeaderIcon Multiparty Monitoring Methods and Protocols for Forest Restoration

PDF Print E-mail

Date Initiated:

  • 2002

Description:

In early 2002, the Ecological Restoration Institute joined with the Forest Trust, Four Corners Institute, the National Forest Foundation, and the USDA Forest Service Collaborative Forest Restoration Program to develop a framework and guidelines for multiparty monitoring and assessment of forest restoration projects. Forty-three ecological scientists, social scientists, Forest Service employees, and community-based restoration practitioners worked together for 8 months to develop the draft document, Multiparty Monitoring and Assessment Guidelines for Community Based Forest Restoration in Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests. This report was the basis for the Collaborative Forest Restoration Program‘s multiparty monitoring technical assistance program.

Monitoring

In 2003-2005, staff from the Ecological Restoration Institute, Four Corners Institute, and Forest Guild revised and expanded the monitoring guidelines into a series of six self- guiding handbooks on conducting multiparty monitoring for Collaborative Forest Restoration Program projects.

ERI is the lead organization on the USDA Forest Service’s Collaborative Forest Restoration Program multiparty monitoring technical assistance team, which continues to develop training materials and provide technical assistance to CFRP grantee communities.

Project Status:

The multiparty monitoring handbooks and other training and outreach materials are periodically updated to reflect new learning. ERI staff use these materials to teach multiparty monitoring methods to community groups interested in forest restoration. Although designed for southwestern forest communities, many of the publications are appropriate to community-based monitoring in other areas. The ERI’s contract to provide technical assistance to Collaborative Forest Restoration Program grantee communities in New Mexico continues through September 2006.

Publications:

  • Ecological Restoration Institute, Forest Trust, Four Corners Institute, National Forest Foundation, Pinchot Institute for Conservation, and USDA Forest Service – Collaborative Forest Restoration Program. 2003. Multiparty Monitoring and Assessment Guidelines for Community Based Forest Restoration in Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests. 94 pp.
  • Derr, T., A. Moote, M. Savage, M. Schumann, J. Abrams, and K. Lowe. 2005. Handbook One: What is multiparty monitoring? The Multiparty Monitoring Handbook Series. Ecological Restoration Institute, NAU, Flagstaff, AZ. 11 pp.
  • Derr, T., A. Moote, M. Savage, M. Schumann, J. Abrams, and K. Lowe. 2005. Monitoring Handbook Two: Developing a multiparty monitoring plan. The Multiparty Monitoring Handbook Series. Ecological Restoration Institute, NAU, Flagstaff, AZ. 13 pp.
  • Derr, T., and M. Schumann. 2005. Monitoring Handbook Three: Budgeting for monitoring. The Multiparty Monitoring Handbook Series. Ecological Restoration Institute, NAU, Flagstaff, AZ. 17 pp.
  • Savage, M., T. Derr, M. Schumann, and J. Abrams. 2005. Monitoring Handbook Four: Monitoring ecological effects. The Multiparty Monitoring Handbook Series. Ecological Restoration Institute, NAU, Flagstaff, AZ. 81 pp.
  • Derr, T., A. Moote, M. Savage, M. Schumann, J. Abrams, and K. Lowe. 2005. Monitoring Handbook Five: Monitoring social and economic effects of forest restoration. The Multiparty Monitoring Handbook Series. Ecological Restoration Institute, NAU, Flagstaff, AZ. 54 pp.
  • Lowe, K., A. Moote, T. Derr, M. Savage, J. Ranger-Moore, and J. Abrams. 2005. Monitoring Handbook Six: Analyzing and interpreting monitoring data. The Multiparty Monitoring Handbooks Series. Ecological Restoration Institute, NAU, Flagstaff, AZ. 87 pp.
  • Derr, T. 2005. Collaborative Forest Restoration Program Monitoring Curriculum: Background and Activities for Ecological Monitoring. USDA Forest Service, Collaborative Forest Restoration Program and Ecological Restoration Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ. 118 pp.
 

Copyright © 2009 All Rights Reserved.
webmaster-eri@nau.edu

Ecological Restoration Institute
P.O. Box 15017, Flagstaff, AZ 86011
Phone: (928)523-7182, Fax: (928)523-0296